Skip to content
Free Consultation
Industries / Financial Services
💹 Financial Services

Month-End Close Shouldn't Take
12 Days. Ours Take 4.

Reconciliation, close cycles, audit prep — rule-based work that people still do by hand. We automate it: books closed in days, transactions reconciled automatically, every step logged for audit.

6–8 days
Median month-end close for
mid-sized companies
(APQC benchmarking data)
12 → 4
Days close cycle reduced
on our finance project
€175K
Annual savings on our
month-end close automation

The Finance Team's Recurring Fire Drills

Close cycles, reconciliations, audit prep — each is a structured process with defined rules. Manual execution is the bottleneck, not the skill.

📅
The 12-Day Close That Should Be 4

Four analysts, hundreds of manual reconciliation steps, a 30% rework rate. Every close is the same fire drill — and the same scramble on day 10 over a discrepancy from day 3.

Manual Matching and a 30% Rework Rate

Matching transactions across accounts and GL codes is rule-based work. Done by hand at volume, it produces errors — which compound into revised entries, mismatches, and audit findings.

📋
Audit Preparation as a Project

Pulling records, compiling reports, and cross-referencing by hand turns audit prep into a multi-week project every cycle. The data is there — people shouldn't have to assemble it.

🕵
Compliance Documents That Don't Keep Up

Regulatory reports, VAT reconciliation, cost allocation — the same data, reformatted for each recipient. Done manually, they're always slightly late, slightly inconsistent, one formatting error from a delayed submission.

What the Finance System Does

Process Automation · Finance

Month-End Close in 4 Days, Not 12

12 working days every month, four analysts, hundreds of manual reconciliation steps, a 30% rework rate. We built a reconciliation engine that pulls in transaction feeds, matches across accounts, flags exceptions for review, and produces audit-ready reports on schedule.

Before Raw feeds Manual matching 30% rework 12-day close
After Transaction feeds AI reconciliation engine Exception queue 4-day close / 99% accuracy
Annual savings
€175K
Close cycle
12 days → 4 days
Reconciliation accuracy
99%

8 working days recovered per close, across 4 analysts, every month: 384 analyst-days a year back on real work. At €365/day that's €140K, plus €35K of rework and restatement avoided. Payback: ~9 weeks.

See this and 8 more case studies →

Finance Automation Requires Audit Trails, Not Just Speed

A fast reconciliation that can't be audited isn't a reconciliation — it's a liability. We build both.

Multi-source transaction ingestion

Pulls in feeds from banks, your ERP, payment processors, and manual uploads — and lines them up to one format before matching. No prep script anyone has to remember to run.

Rule-based + ML matching engine

Your matching rules handle the clear cases across accounts and GL codes; the AI layer catches the patterns the rules miss. Only genuine exceptions reach a person.

Scheduled audit-ready report generation

Close reports, reconciliation summaries, and compliance outputs generate on schedule, in a consistent format — each carrying a timestamped record of what matched, what flagged, and when.

Tamper-evident change log

Every change — automated or human — is logged with time, user, and reason, and can't be quietly edited. Auditors get a clean trail. Finance stops rebuilding it from email threads.

What Runs the Reconciliation Engine

Python / pandas
Cleans and matches the transactions
Azure OpenAI
Sorts the messy cases and exceptions
PostgreSQL
Stores transactions and the audit log
FastAPI
Connects to your ERP and delivers reports
Celery + Redis
Runs the close on schedule
React (exception dashboard)
Where your team reviews flagged items

How long does your month-end close take?

Tell us your close cycle, your team size, and the systems you use. We'll scope what's realistic to automate and give you a number.

Map my close cycle